# OUnit user guide

Index of types
Index of values
Index of modules
Index of module types

## What is unit Testing?

A test-oriented methodology for software development is most effective whent tests are easy to create, change, and execute. The JUnit tool pioneerded for test-first development in Java. OUnit is an adaptation of JUnit to OCaml.

With OUnit, as with JUnit, you can easily create tests, name them, group them into suites, and execute them, with the framework checking the results automatically.

## Getting Started

The basic principle of a test suite is to have a file test.ml which will contain the tests, and an OCaml module under test, named foo.ml.

File foo.ml:

`(* The functions we wish to test *)
let unity x = x;;
let funix ()= 0;;
let fgeneric () = failwith "Not implemented";;
`

The main point of a test is to check that the function under test has the expected behavior. You check the behavior using assert functions. The most simple one is `OUnit.assert_equal`. This function compares the result of the function with an expected result.

The most useful functions are:

- `OUnit.assert_equal` the basic assert function
- `OUnit.(>:::)` to define a list of tests
- `OUnit.(>::)` to name a test
- `OUnit.run_test_tt_main` to run the test suite you define
- `OUnit.bracket` that can help to set and clean environment, it is especially useful if you deal with temporary filename.

File test.ml:

`open OUnit;;
let test1 () = assert_equal "x" (Foo.unity "x");;
let test2 () = assert_equal 100 (Foo.unity 100);;
(* Name the test cases and group them together *)
let suite =
"suite">:::
["test1">:: test1;
"test2">:: test2]
;;
let _ =
run_test_tt_main suite
;;
`

And compile the module

`$ ocamlfind ocamlc -o test -package oUnit -linkpkg -g foo.ml test.ml
`

A executable named "test" will be created. When run it produces the following output.

`$ ./tests
..
Ran: 2 tests in: 0.00 Seconds
OK
`

When using `OUnit.run_test_tt_main`, a non zero exit code signals that the test suite was not successful.

## Advanced usage

The topics, cover here, are only for advanced users who wish to unravel the power of OUnit.

OUnit | Unit test building blocks
OUnitDiff | Unit tests for collection of elements

### Error reporting

The error reporting part of OUnit is quite important. If you want to identify the failure, you should tune the display of the value and the test.

Here is a list of thing you can display:

- name of the test: OUnit use numbers to define path's test. But an error reporting about a failed test "0:1:2" is less explicit than "OUnit:0:comparator:1:float_comparator:2"
- `~msg` parameter: it allows you to define say which assert has failed in your test. When you have more than one assert in a test, you should provide a `~msg` to be able to make the difference
- `~printer` parameter: `OUnit.assert_equal` allows you to define a printer for compared values. A message `"abcd" is not equal to "defg"` is better than `not equal`

`open OUnit;;
let _ =
"mytest">::
(fun () ->
assert_equal
~msg:"int value"
~printer:string_of_int
1
(Foo.unity 1))
;;
`

### Command line arguments

`OUnit.run_test_tt_main` already provides a set of command line argument to help user to run only the test he wants:

- `-only-test`: skip all the tests except this one, you can use this flag several time to select more than one test to run
- `-list-test`: list all the available tests and exit
- `-verbose`: rather than displaying dots while running the test, be more verbose
- `-help`: display help message and exit

It is also possible to add your own command-line arguments. You should do it if you want to define some extra arguments. For example:

`open OUnit;;
let my_program_to_test =
ref None
;;
let test1 () =
match !my_program_to_test with
| Some prg ->
assert_command prg []
| None ->
skip_if true "My program is not defined"
;;
let _ =
run_test_tt_main
~arg_specs:["-my-program",
Arg.String (fun fn -> my_program_to_test := Some fn),
"fn Program to test"]
("test1" >:: test1)
;;
`

### Skip and todo tests

Tests are not always meaningful and can even fail because something is missing in the environment. In order to manage this, you can define a skip condition that will skip the test.

If you start by defining your tests rather than implementing the functions under test, you know that some tests will just fail. You can mark these tests as to do tests, this way they will be reported differently in your test suite.

`open OUnit;;
let _ =
"allfuns" >:::
[
"funix">::
(fun () ->
skip_if (Sys.os_type = "Win32") "Don't work on Windows";
assert_equal
0
(Foo.funix ()));
"fgeneric">::
(fun () ->
todo "fgeneric not implemented";
assert_equal
0
(Foo.fgeneric ()));
]
;;
`

### Effective OUnit

This section is about general tips about unit testing and OUnit. It is the result of some years using OUnit in real world applications.

- test everything: the more you create tests, the better chance you have to catch early an error in your program. Every submitted bugs to your application should have a matching tests. This is a good practice, but it is not always easy to implement.
- test only what is really exported: on the long term, you have to maintain your test suite. If you test low-level functions, you'll have a lot of tests to rewrite. You should focus on creating tests for functions for which the behavior shouldn't change.
- test fast: the best test suite is the one that runs after every single build. You should set your default Makefile target to run the test suite. It means that your test suite should be fast to run, typically, a 10s test suite is fine.
- test long: contrary to the former tip, you should also have a complete test suite which can be very long to run. The best way to achieve both tips, is to define a command line arguments `-long` and skip the tests that are too long in your test suite according to it. When you do a release, you should use run your long test suite.
- family tests: when testing behavior, most of the time you call exactly the same code with different arguments. In this case `List.map` and `OUnit.(>:::)` are your friends. For example:

`open OUnit;;
let _ =
"Family">:::
(List.map
(fun (arg,res) ->
let title =
Printf.sprintf "%s->%s" arg res
in
title >::
(fun () ->
assert_equal res (Foo.unity arg)))
["abcd", "abcd";
"defg", "defg";
"wxyz", "wxyz"])
;;
`

- test failures and successes: the most obvious thing you want to test are successes, i.e. that you get the expected behavior in the normal case. But most of the errors arise in corner cases and in the code of the test itself. For example, you can have a partial application of your `OUnit.assert_equal` and never encounter any errors, just because the `assert_equal` is not called. In this case, if you test errors as well, you will have a missing errors as well.
- set up and clean your environment in the test: you should not set up and clean your test environment outside the test. Ideally, if you run no tests, the program should do nothing. This is also a sane way to be sure that you are always testing in a clean environment, not polluted by the result of failed tests run before.

`open OUnit;;
let _ =
(* We need to call a function in a particular directory *)
"change-dir-and-run">::
bracket
(fun () ->
let pwd = Sys.getcwd () in
Sys.chdir "test";
pwd)
(fun _ ->
assert_command "ls" [])
(fun pwd ->
Sys.chdir pwd)
;;
`

- separate your test: OUnit test code should live outside the code under tests. This allow to drop the dependency on OUnit when distributing your library/application. This also enables people to easily make a difference from what really matters (the main code) and what are only tests. It is possible to have it directly in the code, like in Quickcheck style tests.

The unit testing scope is always hard to define. Unit testing should be about testing a single features. But OUnit can help you to test higher level behavior, by running a full program for example. While it isn't real unit testing, you can use OUnit to do it and should not hesitate to do it.

In term of line of codes, a test suite can represent from 10% to 150% of the code under test. With time, your test suite will grow faster than your program/library. A good ratio is 33%.
Author(s): Maas-Maarten Zeeman, Sylvain Le Gall